THE COLLECTOR Read Online Free Without Download - PDF, ePub, Fb2 eBooks by John Fowles.1ST US EDITION THE COLLECTOR JOHN FOWLES CLASSIC FILM BASIS TERENCE STAMP: JOHN FOWLES: Books
Looking for:
The collector 1963 book free |
The collector 1963 book free. The Collector
Hailed as the first modern psychological thriller, The Collector is the bestselling novel that catapulted John Fowles into the front rank of contemporary novelists. The novel contains both the perspective of the captor and the captive.
The Collector is the the collector 1963 book free novel by John Fowles, whose multilayered fiction frequently explores the tensions between free will and the constraints of society, even as it plays with traditional novelistic conventions, and challenges readers to find their own interpretations.
The Artist edition is limited to copies with a dust jacket featuring an illustration by Tom Adams which appeared on the cover of the first paperback edition of the novel. It is a full the collector 1963 book free, smyth sewn binding with two-hits foil stamping. The edition is printed offset on archival Cougar Vellum and is housed in an illustrated paper covered slipcase. The Numbered edition of copies is a quarter leather binding with Collectorr paper sides handmade in Portugal.
The edition is printed letterpress on Mohawk Superfine and is housed in an embossed paper covered slipcase with an acrylic topcoat. If there are any copies of the Numbered editions remaining after the Matching Pre-Order, depending on quantities these copies will be available for purchase either by lottery or directly through the online store.
The Lettered edition is limited to 26 copies and is a full leather bradel binding with amandine buffalo covering the boards, and blackberry goatskin on the spine. The front cover features a handmade больше на странице butterfly leather onlay. Endsheets are hand marbled and custom designed for this edition.
The enclosure is handmade from Tulipwood the collector 1963 book free features an acrylic viewing panel in the lid displaying seven paper butterflies with their scientific names printed letterpress on paper labels. It is made to the collector 1963 book free like an entomological viewing case, showcasing the group of butterflies. The box is made by routing out grooves for the acrylic and base panels to sit in. The lid is rebated and pushes snugly onto the base.
The corners of the box are secured the collector 1963 book free splines of oak, chosen to contrast with the paler Tulipwood of the fre box. The book sits in a well in the base of the box which is lined with dark grey suede. If any copies of the Lettered edition are available when it opens up for the collector 1963 book free pre-order, those will be the collector 1963 book free through a lottery нажмите чтобы узнать больше. John Fowles — was educated at Oxford and subsequently lectured in English at universities in Greece collecto the UK.
The success of his first novel, The Collectorpublished inallowed him to devote all his time to writing. Fowles spent the last decades of his life on the southern coast of England in the collfctor harbor town of Lyme Regis.
Bradford Morrow Photo by Michael Eastman. Henry and Pushcart Prizes, and a Нажмите чтобы прочитать больше Fellowship. Morrow is the founder and editor of the acclaimed literary journal, Conjunctions. He is a full-time illustrator whose work frequently explores how humanity moves, thinks and behaves by reflex and without autonomy.
He exhibits his art in galleries throughout the world. Numbered and Lettered editions are collectorr for pre-order on Saturday, October 16th at 9 A. Please note : If any copies of the Lettered editions are available, those will be sold through a lottery only, the collector 1963 book free depending on quantities, the Numbered edition will больше информации available for purchase either by lottery or directly through the online store.
PT on the day of announcement. If you did not receive the email, contact us here. If your order is not received before the deadline, your designated number or letter will be assigned to the new owner. Please be aware of the order limits for our editions. You can read more about this in the Order Limits article on our /24103.txt site.
Published editions may differ slightly from mockups and prototype designs. You can save time at checkout by registering your Partial. This 163 the service we use to administer the installment payments. If you already have an account, feee is no need to register again. Installment plans only available during pre-order. All rights reserved. Login or Create an Account.
Amazon - The Collector (Back Bay Books): Fowles, John: Books.
The Collector by Fowles, John
Back in the day, I didn't grade this book because I wasn't sure, after reading it, that it was actually a Phantom-inspired novel. While it shares a big old heap of the same setup and themes, the author had addressed the idea slightly in one of his commentaries and claimed that it was intentionally crafted for his own commentary rather than following in the shoes of Leroux's.
However, it covers so much of the same territory and does so so brilliantly that I reviewed it anyway, and after more consideration, I'm not sure I really believe Fowles, to be honest. Either way, I'd happily point anyone who enjoys Leroux's story toward Fowles' with a glad heart. Part The novel opens with a quote from La Chatelaine de Vergi , a lovely medieval French romance about a knight and his forbidden lady love.
I, too, am in love, pretty much instantly. The line " Que fors aus ne le sot riens nee " translates roughly to "And no one knew but them", referring to the hidden romance between the main characters. That this should chill the reader down to the marrow of his or her bones is not readily apparent yet, but it certainly will be later.
There are a great number of parallels between this story and Leroux's, though not always in expected ways. The main character is Frederick, a lonely lower-class accountant and amateur entomologist who sees the lovely Miranda, an art student, from afar and becomes obsessed with her.
The parallel to Erik's obsession with Christine is clear, as are the similarities in description between Christine and Miranda blonde, blue-eyed, pure and innocent, delicate, etc. Other areas are obviously less related, such as the fact that Frederick does not attempt to set up any kind of mentor relationship with Miranda, instead merely watching her and daydreaming about her from his office building across the street. Frederick himself is a terrifying character, which again is not immediately apparent at the beginning of the book.
Fowles uses style as a clue, delivering all of the narration for Part One in a stilted, halting, and unembellished fashion that mirrors Frederick's own lack of grace and imagination. The only thing that he ever appears passionate about is his hobby; he collects butterflies and goes to great lengths to capture especially impressive specimens or rare mutations. Using the word "passionate" to describe him is not really accurate even in this context; passion is a very foreign emotion to this character, who spends the majority of the novel grasping after it or believing he is experiencing it while being very demonstrably detached from true emotional involvement.
Frederick is quite simply incapable of really understanding or having any empathy for other people as having emotions similar to his own, but he understands society well enough that he attempts to respond appropriately anyway and in no way ever realizes that his outlook is out of the ordinary. Frederick's obsession with Miranda is initially fairly innocent; he enjoys watching her, daydreams about one day meeting her and even about living together in a house, where he constructs sunny scenarios of himself collecting butterflies while she paints them in brilliant color.
The only moment that hints at a darker undercurrent occurs when he sees her begin going out on the town with a young man and his fantasies occasionally turn more violent, involving her begging him for forgiveness or even including occasional violence against her.
The parallel to Erik's sudden turn off the deep end after the introduction of Raoul is also notable. It becomes clear that Frederick is not a normal dude throughout the first part of the novel, but since it is told from his point of view and Fowles is a master of subtle prose, it occurs in a sort of slow-motion creeping that eventually forces the reader to confront the uncomfortable feeling of something being wrong.
Numerous asides that make no sense to us yet occur, usually involving Frederick claiming whether in desperation or flatline matter-of-factness is open to interpretation, as the intentionally blank prose provides few clues that he never planned things to happen the way they did or that nothing that went wrong was his fault.
A lengthy interlude also establishes that he considers himself asexual and disdains the "crudity" of humanity's mating urge; his only sexual experience is a failed encounter with a sex worker, which he ends almost before it begins out of repulsion it's hard to tell if he's repulsed by the idea of the sex act, or by the sex worker herself.
Despite this and his frequently-expressed disgust for "deviancy", Frederick purchases a lot of pornography; his obsession with photographs and, representationally, life distilled into perfect stillness will be a major running theme.
It's clear that Fowles means Frederick's asexuality to describe him as in some way incapable of relating to other human beings "normally", which is not surprising since this book was written in the early s but is still disappointing. A much less subtle clue to his status as social outsider is his outright statement that he thinks that Mabel - his wheelchair-bound cousin, with whom he has been brought up as siblings - should be "put down" painlessly, a belief he applies to all disabled people in order to save them and their families needless difficulty.
The fact that Mabel's disability makes him uncomfortable is the driving motivator; there is not even a whisper of empathy or even recognization of the emotions or challenges that she must face because of it. Another major theme, one that is key both for this novel and in Leroux's, is that of class lines and social striation. Frederick is very blatantly from a lower social class than many other characters in the novel, a fact betrayed occasionally by his style of speech but more frequently by his own antagonistic musings against the higher classes and their "airs" and "affectations".
His deep, almost instinctive resentment of the higher classes is only intensified when he wins a large amount of prize money; not only is he predisposed to hate them because of his less than privileged upbringing, but he immediately senses and resents the fact that being "new money" does not automatically cause the "old money" to accept him as one of their own.
One of the major things that attracts him to Miranda in the first place is that, despite her being born into a more privileged class, she displays very little affectation and seems to ignore the social lines he is so adamant about delineating; whether or not this is true or merely a facet added by his admiration of her is impossible to tell, since he seldom gives meaningful examples and Miranda herself has no place in his narrative.
Frederick is the very epitome of an unreliable narrator, and the longer his drawn-out introduction goes on, slowly revealing his distressing detachment and intensifying the foreshadowing that something terrible is going to happen at the end of the story, the more skin-crawling he becomes for the reader. Frederick's fantasies grow slowly more involved, in some casting him in the role of a hero rescuing her from some antagonist so that she falls in immediate gratitude-motivated love with him; from there, he makes a sudden leap to kidnapping her, though he never uses such ugly words to describe it to himself as the constant reiteration of "it wasn't my fault" and "I didn't plan it" highlight, Frederick is a master of denial and never allows anything that might make him question himself to stick for long.
He describes it instead as keeping her at his house "in a nice way", in the hopes that she will eventually choose to marry him.
For those familiar with the Phantom story, his explanation of his motives rings eerily familiar: "I thought, I can't ever get to know her in the ordinary way, but if she's with me, she'll see my good points, she'll understand. There was always the idea that she would understand. Without the deformity, a physical and concrete motivator for shutting himself off from others, Frederick does so out of choice in order to avoid their ridicule often exemplified by a co-worker who makes fun of his weekend "dates" with butterflies instead of girls.
Even this bears close resemblance to Erik's withdrawal, however; both characters consider themselves to be every bit as human and deserving as the rest of their society - in many ways superior, in fact - but choose to wall themselves off from it and focus on their disenfranchisement rather than deal with a world that does not appreciate them. Of course, in Erik's case, a very visible disability that causes others to mistreat him is a pretty strong motivator for avoiding people; in Frederick's, the complaint is simply that people don't like him and he doesn't appreciate that, and his one-sided narrative conveniently ignores any of the reasons others might have to have difficulty socially interacting with him.
Frederick's obsession with Miranda continues for literally years before the main action of the novel starts; he carries it throughout her teen years until she moves to London for art school, whereupon he becomes somewhat rootless and lethargic in her absence. Even during this period, during which he claims he almost forgot about her, his fixation is all too strong and apparent to the reader. The continuous repetition of the idea that he never planned to do anything becomes more and more obviously denial as he takes trips to London to find out where she hangs out and intentionally covers his tracks, just in case someone might be watching for him.
The most damning moment comes when, while looking for a house to buy, he purchases a country cottage after seeing the double cellar it contains and thinking idly, he insists about how easily the sub-basement could be converted into a living space for a captive. The sub-basement setup is again very reminiscent of Leroux's story with its descending layers of underground, and the fact that the second basement was originally a Roman chapel adds a layer of worshipfulness to the proceedings, an outward expression of Frederick's borderline-religious idolization of Miranda that is again very reminiscent of Erik's treatment of Christine.
Another brilliantly illuminative line occurs when, in reference to the cellars and what occurs in them later in the story, Frederick says, "It was two worlds. It's always been like that. Some days I've woken up and it's all been like a dream, till I went down again. The matter-of-factness and complete lack of moral qualms, worry, or even the decency to admit what he is doing to himself carries the reader in a state of agitated apprehension as Frederick rebuilds and furnishes the sub-basement specifically as if he were planning to keep a "guest" down there.
The juxtaposition between him populating it with ladies' clothing and books on art at the same time and in the same unvarying tone as he furnishes it with several redundant layers of security designed to keep anyone from getting out further serves to drive home his complete and intentional detachment between the ideas of Miranda as a "friendly guest" and as an unwilling prisoner. The momentum of the novel, which by this point is practically barreling toward his actions, actually increases when he also purchases a van, guts and outfits it with restraints, and spends some time experimenting and familiarizing himself with chloroform before booking himself a rotating and untraceable battery of hotel rooms around the art school Miranda attends.
The actual scene in which he kidnaps her, luring her toward his van by mentioning an injured dog he has struck before chloroforming her and tying her up, is almost a release of tension, but the reader that assumes the situation must be resolved soon is in for a long, intense journey. It is almost startling to actually see Miranda interact and begin to do things once she regains consciousness and finds herself a prisoner; having seen her only through the lens of Frederick's obsession, the reader has been tricked into viewing her the same way he does and is accordingly surprised when she turns out to have a personality of her own.
It's an exceptional personality, as well: smart, sassy, savvy and brave, she is a wondrously strong female character and a perfect analogue for Leroux's Christine, just as unwilling to give up and ready to refuse to tolerate indignity.
Frederick is most certainly surprised, as his fantasies did not include her strenuous rejection and demands to be released, and even though he continues to cling to his idealized vision of her, the reader can see the first moment of their interaction as the moment that the strange and horrible innocence of his dreams is shattered. It's an inverted version of the scene in which Christine discovers Erik to be a man rather than an angel; in both cases, the sudden realization that the dream is merely coarse reality is jarring and life-changing.
Interestingly, Frederick, when asked his name, tells her that it is Ferdinand. While it's not surprising that he might want to set himself into the role of her lover Ferdinand being the prince that eventually marries Miranda in Shakespeare's The Tempest , it is another moment of very obvious disconnection when he informs us in his narrative that he "doesn't know" why he said it. He is incapable of admitting it even to himself, hiding even now from the knowledge of what he is doing; in a different character this might be a sign of guilt, but in the stupendously guilt-free but undeniably orderly universe Frederick inhabits, what it really is is an unwillingness to confront the fact that he has done something that he knows was fundamentally unacceptable.
At various other times, he reiterates occasionally to Miranda herself that he believes that many more people would do the same thing he is doing if they had access to money the way he does, a statement that is less true than it is rationalizing. He is not bothered by his own foray outside society's rules enough to stop doing it, but he is bothered enough to have to convince himself and Miranda, if he can that what he's doing is perfectly natural after all.
Miranda, being the spirited girl she is, will have none of his dissembling, and quite finally puts an end to his romanticizing of his behavior by snapping, "Ferdinand.
They should have called you Caliban. The bulk of the book occurs now, and it is a sometimes-interminable sometimes-unbearable journey through the enforced interactions between Frederick and Miranda. Fowles is never boring, nor is he anything but brilliant in his writing, but the sheer weight of the emotional content and the ever-present sense of doom make it a hard read nevertheless.
Despite his earlier musing on Miranda's "classlessness", Frederick very quickly blames her higher class standing for her apparent inability to calm down and be reasonable about having been kidnapped. He seldom approaches the level of resentment he reserves for most people of her echelon, but his sullen thoughts assert that the two of them could never overcome the class barrier no matter how hard he tries or how much she lies about it note, again, that the idea of Miranda doing anything active never even crosses his mind, both because of his inability to conceive of her in empathetic terms and because of her status as representative of the higher class.
More to the point, Frederick's belief in his own disenfranchisement rears its head in an especially ugly manner when he brings the idea of his own entitlement into the equation: having never had much in life before winning the money he's using to do this, he's making up for it now, and the implication that Miranda, as the upper-class representative, owes it to him to love him is doubly frightening because he doesn't in any way recognize why the idea is so unpalatable to her.
Many, many, many derivative Phantom-based works also play on the idea that Christine somehow owes it to the Phantom to love him back, both because of the depth of his emotions and because it wouldn't be fair to continue to deprive a man who has had so little in life; Fowles shows us in stark, unignorable contrast how very horrible that idea is. Miranda, for her part, alternately loathes and pities Frederick, who spends most of his days in the basement staring contentedly at her no matter what she might be doing.
Their dynamic is, like Erik's and Christine's, very reminiscent of the Greek myth of Hades kidnapping Persephone; Frederick's obsession with freezing life into unmoving death and knowledge, symbolized by his butterfly and photograph collecting, is in direct opposition to Miranda's lively and life-celebrating organic art and desire to directly experience things.
Frederick is capable of seeing and desiring that liveliness in her, but ultimately he knows of no other way to express that desire except to possess her, which of course kills the very lively qualities he so prizes, just like killing a butterfly to add it to a collection.
Frederick's inability to really express his emotions is his most marked difference from Leroux's Erik; where Erik could create Don Juan Triumphant and write music to mirror his soul, Frederick has no such outlet.
Instead, his butterflies are his means of expression, but even they are unchanging and dead. It was hard for me, as a reader, to decide over the course of the novel if this made him less frightening than Erik, whose passions and their expression were frequently horrible or lethal for those around him, or more, since his stolid lack of any kind of expression made him all the more internally dangerous and unpredictable.
Fowles actually plays to us a little bit in here, though not quite to the extent of breaking the suspension of realism; Miranda herself comments on Frederick's didactic and clinical way of speaking, saying that he takes all the color out of words and language when he uses them. The narration is indeed dry as dust, and Fowles reminding us of it clues the reader in to the fact that it's not just authorial style but an actual facet of Frederick's character.
Frederick is somewhat incapable of understanding why Miranda is afraid of him despite her various attempts to explain; since he believes himself to be in love with her and has no plans to hurt her, he finds her reticence and apprehension confusing. Miranda herself is much more cognizant of the fact that, inevitably, the situation is going to spiral out of control, and she's unhampered by the unflinching veil of denial that Frederick conducts all emotional affairs from behind.
When she says, "What I fear in you is something you don't know is in you It's lurking somewhere about in this house, this room, this situation, waiting to spring. In a way we're on the same side against it," it's with brilliant clarity that tells us that she understands him far better in some ways than vice versa.
An interesting feature of their relationship - and one that is again mirrored by the characters of Leroux's novel - is the fact that Frederick consistently and instinctively places Miranda upon a pedestal that he can't aspire to in fact, the idea of aspiring to it would be entirely foreign to him.
It's an automatic reaction that is partly motivated by his miring in the muck of his observation of class lines - he can't help but place her above him no matter how much the idea might provoke resentment, because instinctively he assumes that she is above him - and partly, once again, by his tendency to freeze and immortalize the things he wants to look at, making perfection out of them in a way he can't achieve for himself.
When she stamps her foot in frustration and declares, "You always squirm one step lower than I can go," she is being truthful: no matter who she verbally castigates him or refuses to appreciate his behavior, he always automatically assigns the blame to himself rather than to her not that he feels guilt; he doesn't, but he does acknowledge that it must be something he has done.
When it becomes clear to Miranda that he intends to keep her in the basement for an indefinite period of time, she responds by going on a hunger strike; having discovered that he isn't holding her for either ransom or sexual favors, it's the simplest and most elegant way of threatening to take what he wants - her presence - away from him. This is also a confusing event for Frederick, who can't understand what her constant fussing is about when he's gone to so much trouble to provide her with books and music and food and clothing.
In an attempt to stop her from starving himself, and as a result of her continual begging and pleading, he finally agrees to let her leave in four weeks if she will behave herself as his guest. Miranda does keep her promise and her escape attempts and tantrums become less frequent, but Frederick, who had counted on her falling in love with him by the end of the four weeks, finds himself growing more and more desperate as time begins ticking inexorably closer.
Finally, his ultimate plan is to propose to her on the night before he is scheduled to release her; with chillingly cold calculation, he notes that she will stay of her own free will if she says yes, and that if she says no he will have a reason to punish her by refusing to let her leave, placing the blame for the decision squarely on her shoulders no matter what she does.
It's difficult, once again, to pinpoint whether it's more disturbing that he plans to not only continue holding her captive but blame her for doing so, or that he genuinely believes that there's a chance she might say yes to his proposal. Miranda is too honest for her own good, so she refuses and is condemned to the basement again after a very disturbing interlude in which she tries to run, he chloroforms her, and then he removes all her clothing except for her underwear after putting her back in her room as usual, the motivation is not overtly sexual, though the reader is confronted by hints of undercurrents that Frederick is not admitting to and the implication that he can only desire her when she's unconscious [i.
The novel is gaining momentum again, the reader feeling the pressure of her continuing and continually helpless attempts to escape and Frederick's own slowly-building irritation at her behavior. By the time Frederick is frequently comparing Miranda to a butterfly - a beautiful emerging imago, soon to be in her full splendor - the metaphor is almost unnecessary except to most fully presage the disaster we know must be to come.
Ironically, when Miranda entices him into a game of charades to pass the time and she pretends to be a butterfly, he is unable to guess, incapable of recognizing her lively, fluttering version of the creatures he keeps pinned in glass boxes.
An important theme is crystallized here when Miranda, frustrated by her inability to get Frederick to display any kind of empathy, outlines the difference in their outlooks by presenting them as differing spectrums. For Miranda, an artist and free spirit, the continuum of life runs from the ugly to the beautiful; anything beautiful is worthwhile for its own sake, while anything ugly is to be shunned.
She's not talking about specifically physical beauty, but rather about artistic contribution or things that make the world better in any form. For Frederick, on the other hand, the continuum runs from evil to good and has almost no space between; he judges everything in life according to his own criteria and labels it as one or the other, as neatly and unfairly as he labels the butterflies in their boxes.
Comments
Post a Comment